A.I. Information Isn't the Bible/Gospel Truth
This post is pretty simple really: the information we can glean from A.I. isn't the Bible/Gospel truth.
This doesn't mean to say that A.I. is necessarily wrong. It just means that spiritually, A.I. is apocryphal: a hodgepodge of truths and not so much truths.
For example, I typed my name into A.I. At first, it admitted it hadn't heard of me. Yet when I added some more details, it began to embellish and to basically create a character with my name, yet who doesn't actually exist. I checked with Google, and my A.I. generated namesake who was meant to be a public figure who would have been find-able on Google simply didn't exist.
Basically, A.I. information has to be taken with a liberal pinch of salt.
We have to be careful when creating supposedly Biblical/Gospel content with A.I.'s help. I'm not saying A.I. can't give a textbook answer at times, but A.I. isn't indwelt by the Holy Spirit of God. We should trust ourselves as vessels of God's Spirit and students of the word over A.I., however clever it may be.
I think Balaam in the Bible is a classic example of someone who technically was theologically correct, but his heart was a million miles from the truth. A.I. doesn't even have a soul or a spirit, unlike even Balaam. I'm not saying that A.I. is necessarily Machiavellian/sinister, but it doesn't have a heart, and it isn't to be idolised as a source of spiritual truth.
What's your verdict on A.I.?
Comments
Post a Comment