False

 For it would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment delivered to them.
2 Peter 2:21 ESV
https://bible.com/bible/59/2pe.2.21.ESV

Is it better to have loved and lost, or never to have loved at all? When it comes to God, it would be better to have never loved Him at all than to have claimed to do so, and then to change our minds. Worse than overt apostates are fake Christians who become false teachers.

The false teaching Peter seems to be getting at is the idea that God loves us regardless. We might call it 'cheap grace'. This is the idea that we can get away with failing to change having professed faith in Jesus.

If we trust Jesus, we cannot stay as we are. We must change. The righteous live by faith alone, but saving faith is always accompanied by works as the evidence of our faith.

As Paul says (and I paraphrase): shall we carry on sinning so that grace might superabound? God forbid! God's love demands a transformed life in response to it.

'God our Lord, please help us to discern false teaching, which seeks to minimise and excuse sin. May we truly change in response to Your transformative grace. In Christ's name, amen'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mercy

Power

Follow!